Archive for the ‘Television’ Category

SXSWiLogo4Next up at SXSW was “Exploring Place with Cross-Platform Storytelling“: examples of how new technologies like geo-tagging, location-aware devices, interactive video and augmented reality are being combined with traditional storytelling methods to explore the world in richer, more in-depth ways than ever before…

The panel was made up of: Mike Knowlton, CTO of Storycode; Danny Harris, Creative Director at StorySocial; documentary filmmaker and cross-platform producer, Liz Nord; and Executive Director of ARTE France Cinema, Michel Reilhac. Knowlton began by talking about “story as software”, suggesting that cross-platform storytelling and new technologies allow creators to make more immersive, more iterative content. As scene-setting, he introduced some case studies: ”The Silent History“, serialised iPad/iPod novel; “Rough Ride – The Oil Patch Tour”, interactive documentary; “NY Hearts” interactive neighbourhoods project; and ”Welcome to Pine Point” created by NFB.

Liz Nord introduced her project “Jerusalem Unfiltered” which offers an immersive insider’s perspective on the city. Interestingly, Nord has launched the content-rich site more than a year before the film is due to complete in late-2014.

Jerusalem

Danny Harris reflected on his StorySocial project, People’s District, which became “Washington D.C.’s largest and most ambitious non institutional-based oral history project”. Over three years, Harris traveled across all 120+ city neighbourhoods to piece together a “people’s history” of the District told through some 2,000 diverse interviews. Explore more StorySocial projects here.

Cinemacity-Galley-1-960x400Michel Reilhac showcased one of the most unique immersive projects, ARTE’s CinemaCity: a geolocalized augmented reality project which allows users to overlay the physical experience of walking through Paris with excerpts of films shot on that location. Costing $417k, the project will launch in June 2013, when Paris city authorities will open up the wifi network so free connectivity will drive update. Reilhac reported that the ambition is to roll-out the project to the world’s other “film cities”.

The panel commented that integrating physical space into storytelling “allows the audience to consume the narrative in a far more intimate way”. Knowlton summarised that place can be integrated via technology to make the storytelling experience deeper, but also to encourage audiences to physically explore place to unlock narrative content. As creators, Nord suggested producers need to fully interrogate the impact of immersive place on the narrative approach, from the degree of user autonomy to platforms and devices.

ovee_logoToday’s SXSW session “Lean Forward and Back: Social Video Can Have It All” explored how great technology and UX can engage audiences with online video as a social experience using the case study of OVEE, the social screening platform created by the Independent Television Service. 

The Online Video Engagement Experience (OVEE) platform was created to present high quality film and television content online, and building a real-time engagement experience around it for public television viewers, teachers and communities of interest, to “watch together, from anywhere”. OVEE is a freestanding web application that synchs up multiple streams on the PBS COVE website, and allows online viewers to interact in real time around content by signing on through the platform or via Facebook.

IAP4676

“ITVS acknowledged that it was the business model that was getting in the way of truly social commercial TV, with appointment-to-view and broadcast revenue still dominant” said Dennis Palmieri, Director of Innovation & Media Strategies at ITVS. But as a public television station focussed on engagement and education, ITVS could move beyond the business model to innovate. Understanding that audiences want interaction but that lean-forward/lean-back experiences are different, OVEE sought to fuse second screen social interaction with primary screen content viewing.

At its heart, OVEE seeks to recreate the experience of going to a live screening venue and watching with an audience. To set up a screening on the OVEE platform, users browse multiple screening types, preview content, and schedule a screening time (up to a year in the future). They then choose whether to make the screening private (invite only through the OVEE email system, used by businesses and education) or public (an open unique URL with ability for attendees to sign in publicly or anonymously). Other options include electing a moderator for the screening, adding panelists or special speakers (who can join via webcam), adding branding or advertising if desired, and even pre-programming interactive moments throughout the screening (polls, announcements, extra information, links etc). Up to 500 users can then join the screening, watch, interact, comment, vote and more, with OVEE syncing concurrent streams within 3 seconds of each other.

Palmieri revealed that OVEE has cost $1.7m to develop to the current beta stage. The focus has been on making PBS’s huge content archive available, but in time the focus will shift to user generated content and a “roadmap to YouTube”.

The BBC has reported usage figures for its web-TV on-demand iPlayer system in 2012, and they are rather startling: 2.32 billion TV and radio programme requests, and 36.5 billion minutes of BBC content accessed in a record-breaking year.  

BBC-iplayerThese figures equates to 70,000 years’ worth of material, making iPlayer a major contender even compared to efforts by Amazon and Netflix. Dramatic year-on-year growth was driven partly by the Olympic year but also from mobile devices, with mobile access now accounting for more than 25% of all iPlayer use.  Since the BBC enabled program downloading onto iPads and iPhone there have been nearly 11 million downloads. Other interesting stats for iPlayer in 2012:

  • a +177% increase of requests from mobiles and tablets – making up over a quarter of total iPlayer requests
  • nearly 14m downloads of the iPlayer mobile app
  • 10.8m programmes downloaded to iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch devices, following the launch of mobile downloads in September 2012
  • requests from PCs comprised less than half of all total iPlayer requests (47% in December 2012)
  • new feature allowing viewers to rewind & restart live TV – used by up to 30% of those watching live TV online

Daniel Danker, General Manager, BBC Programmes and On-Demand, said: “2012 was a ground-breaking year for BBC iPlayer with a record 2.32 billion requests for programmes across over 650 platforms. Last year, the use of iPlayer shifted from PCs and early adopter devices like game consoles to screens used by all audiences. Mobile, tablet, and connected TV skyrocketed, with a particular emphasis on audiences taking iPlayer on the go. This year, we’re looking forward to turning iPlayer into an entertainment destination, with a relentless focus on making iPlayer as easy and enjoyable as television.”  More here.

Update:  BBC announces iPlayer tablet viewing has doubled over January/February 2013 to 40m viewing requests.

Today the BBC gives more insights into a for-profit business model for ‘iPlayer 2.0′ Project Barcelona, and reveals changes to the standard terms of trade to include DTO-rights.

Back in March I wrote about the out-going BBC Director General Mark Thompson’s pledge to make “a dramatic leap forward in digital capability” with the launch of an ‘iPlayer 2.0′ called Project Barcelona.  The DG claimed “the iPlayer is the most successful and most intensively used catch-up service in the world” and signalled an intent to monetise its success.  The idea behind Barcelona is simple: after the 30-day iPlayer window closes, another non-exclusive paid download-to-own window will open.

Today the BBC has begun circulating a more detailed business plan for Project Barcelona, ahead of possible launch at the end of this year.  Project Barcelona will allow users to pay a small fee to download and keep programmes, from both the recent and deep archive.  It has been given the slogan “making the unmissable, unmissable forever” – a twist on the current iPlayer moto.

The BBC is hoping to introduce a clause in its next Terms of Trade for non-exclusive download-to-own (DTO) rights, meaning all original BBC commissions could feature on the new platform.  The proposals are understood to include sliding-scale price points and potential profits for rights holders.  And as discussed back in March, the BBC service is expected to give producers a greater share of the episode download price (around 40p from £1.89) than Apple currently does (28p on the same price).

Originally described as a not-for-profit exercise, the BBC is now aiming to make profit out of the initiative, which it will feed back into its original programming budget.  It has been reported that a new subsidiary may be formed to manage the platform, operating similarly to subsidiaries BBC Studios & Post Production and BBC Worldwide.

The news comes days after Dan Heaf, EVP and managing director of digital for BBC Worldwide, commented on the threat posed by commercial VOD services.  He reportedly said that if all users got their BBC content via services like Netflix at its current subscription rates – the equivalent of £5.99 per month – it could wipe out 80% of BBC Worldwide’s revenues.  BBC Worldwide’s 2011 annual report indicated that it made total sales of £1.15 billion in that year, from which digital entertainment accounted for just 2.3% of revenues (£27.1 million).  Heaf’s remarks came at the launch of BBC Labs, a new incubator/mentorship program to find innovative and potentially revenue-generating digital content services.  Central to this must lie an ambition to replace the £192.3 million Worldwide is reported to make in physical (DVD) sales currently.

It is crucial that digital innovation and commercialisation lies at the very heart of the corporation’s longterm ambitions.  The BBC awaits the green-light from the Trust over today’s announced plans for Project Barcelona.

Update:  The BBC widens its digital offering by launching a live interactive video player in advance of the London 2012 Olympics. The player combines HD video with relevant data designed to enhance the viewing experience. 

Update Oct 2012: BBC rumoured to be expanding on-demand strategy further by developing music-streaming service Playlister

Today I listened to Gary Hayes, Executive Producer for ABC Multiplatform, discussing the “hybrid media challenge” facing broadcasters brought about by the constantly shifting user landscape.  

He identified four forces that are bringing about this monumental change: 1) social sharing; 2) connected on-demand TV; 3) mobile; and 4) transmedia or multiplatform, namely “agnostic content spread across a users ecosystem”. Hayes reported that 18% of all ABC content is currently viewed on mobile and this is expected to outpace PC consumption by next year. The proportion of ABC content consumed on mobile (measured by time spent engagement) is increasing by 1% each month. Touching on social media, Hayes feels that users are increasingly too busy sharing their own stories to consume curated content, and that online social content is becoming more trusted than traditional networked content.

Discussing social TV and the second screen experience, Hayes feels this combination of broadcast TV and social media is creating the most dominating combined force of engagement. He reports that 85% of TV watching in the US is now via a connected device. But Hayes feels that second screen currently lacks true engagement with the editorial content. As such, Hayes is focusing on hybrid commissioning with synchronised second screen experiences at ABC.

Hayes concluded by revealing that ABC is currently prototyping a “companion app” to help users “navigate through the storm of social TV”, which includes integrated on-demand and catch-up, voting and other social feedback mechanisms, some gamification, remote control and more.  Interestingly, his final comment revealed an ambition that, in time, “ABC may become Australia’s broadband community”.

Gary Hayes was talking at the Media140 DigitalBusiness conference focusing on social, mobile and commerce.

XMediaLab Perth 2012 aims to explore how new digital technology impacts and enables storytelling. After a hugely interesting conference day, ”What’s Your Story?“, this weekend sees 16 teams pitch digital projects to a group of international mentors for advice, development and the potential of two $20,000 XML development awards. 

The projects being pitched at the XMedia Lab this weekend include: an animated character world and web-series for teens; a virtual tour of a cancer-care facility in development; an app to facilitate work from intellectually disabled artists; an AR storytelling experience to promote sustainable living; a multiplatform real-time polling app; a location-specific social history project; a participatory multiplatform play; a TV and online project on parenting; an education-by-stealth avatar-based community to engage young people with the arts; a crowd-funded hip-hop cancer awareness documentary and community; and an online mafia fiction story.

I’m here with a team from FORM pitching One Road: a content-rich digital journey and archive repatriation project to extend the reach and impact of the remarkable, award-winning Canning Stock Route project and Yiwarra Kuju exhibition. The teams now have one-to-one sessions with the international mentors, who then vote on the two XML Perth Development Awards, one from Screenwest and the other from DCA.

This week, speaking at the Royal Television Society, BBC Director-General Mark Thompson defined the Corporation’s recent successes and its future in an increasingly “digitally fragmented” world.

The DG reflected on his eight year term: the highs (a renaissance for specialist factual and drama, and impressive growth in digital strategy and BBC Worldwide revenues); the lows (not limited to the “trust” crisis of ‘The Queen’ and competitions, and the Russell Brand affair); and the dark threats of 2012 (wider economic crisis and international threats to journalistic integrity and voice). And to those who foretold the death of the BBC, he had a strong message: the BBC is “not just surviving but thriving”.

The DG reported that the BBC reaches 96% of the UK population every week, with average weekly consumption at 18-19 hours. Despite deep CSR cuts to the World Service’s budget, global audiences are bigger than ever been, turnover as a whole has doubled since 2004, and profits have quadrupled. He claimed that “support for the licence fee is higher today than in the 1980s”, the British public seeing the BBC as “an indispensible public service”. And he believes the Corporation has seen off (at least for now) a series of critical threats – such as the burden of over-75 TV licence fees.

Next up, 2012 will see “a dramatic leap forward in digital capability”. Central to this is an ‘iPlayer 2.0′ called Project Barcelona. The DG claims: “the iPlayer is the most successful and most intensively used catch-up service in the world” and, perhaps unsurprisingly, now wants to monetise its success. The idea behind Barcelona is simple: after the 30-day iPlayer window closes, another non-exclusive paid download-to-own window would open. (A range of media channels reported this announcement as “the BBC plans iTunes competitor”. The clue is in the word ‘non-exclusive’).

Some independent producers are skeptical, worried about the impact on DVD sales and unsure of what revenue share they will receive. However, at the moment, only 7% of BBC content is available for producers to license to iTunes or other download-to-own services, or sold through BBC Worldwide. Thompson was not specific about the timescale or pricing, but sources said programmes could be available to buy at the same time as they go on the iPlayer, with early speculation putting the price at £1.89 a show. And the BBC service is expected to give producers a greater share of the episode download price (around 40p from £1.89) than Apple currently does (28p on the same price). Over time, the ambition is to open up and monetise the BBC’s impressive archive. So it seems Barcelona would be good news for the majority of producers.

Anticipating criticism that viewers were being made to pay twice for content, Thompson said: “This is not a second licence-fee by stealth…it’s the exact analogy of going to the high-street to buy a DVD”. However, as other UK broadcasters extend their catch-up services (Channel 4 announcing 4seven this week) and facing competition from comparably cheap unlimited streaming services like Netflix, he may have to work harder to win that argument at home.

The DG stated: “Freeview, Freesat, DAB, Youview, iPlayer, Radioplayer and Barcelona are all part of one strategy and one big idea – which is that free access to high quality content matters more now than ever and that the BBC must constantly seek new ways of keeping that door open”.

The BBC appears in good digital heath then. But there is a dark cloud on the DG’s horizon: the next Charter in 2016. The same old debate will rage once more – top-slicing, bottom-slicing, the end of the licence-fee – but Thompson believes the BBC has shown itself to be “as much of an innovator and leader in digital as it has been in analogue…remaining the world’s best and most creative broadcaster”. Whether Barcelona will sustain this remains to be seen. But in the face of digital fragmentation, harnessing the BBC brand behind the download-to-own shop-front of Barcelona could provide the Corporation and its producers a rich seam of income in an era of epic public spending cuts.

Update on 19/03/12:  Director-General Mark Thompson announces he will step-down in Autumn 2012. 

I am delighted to announce that I have been selected as a Fellow of the International Creative Entrepreneurs programme, part of Creative Futures.

International Creative Entrepreneurs is an innovative new development opportunity for leaders working in the creative sectors.  From April 2012, I will be working with multidisciplinary creative agency FORM, in Western Australia, which leads industry and cultural development through thought leadership and creative capital.

Central to FORM’s current work is the development of a fully integrated Digital Media Hub as part of Midland Atelier, Western Australia’s first design and creative industries centre. The Foundry Digital Media Hub will aim to nurture innovation, learning, entrepreneurship and creative expression for digital media practitioners including animation, graphic design, web-development, music, gaming,film and 3D development.

From the two-screen habit to the twitter bomb, televisionification to crowd-sourced plots, the way we consume and make TV is changing…  The idiot box used to have our undivided attention.  Now it is an increasingly fragmented experience.  According to MediaCom, nearly 75% of us multi-task while watching TV:  42% are online, 29% are talking on mobile devices, and 26% are sending IM or text messages.   This “two screen habit” has made television an event, where hundreds of thousands interact and comment on content, in real time.

Last year, TV Genius reported that a particularly dramatic X Factor weekend stimulated 257 tweets per minute; four tweets for every second the show was transmitted.  From on-air hashtags to Twitter trends, the switch to ‘participation TV’ is clear.

But the twittering classes are not only affecting the way we consume television, but also changing the way it is made.  Some broadcasters are now responding to real time social engagement to adapt live programmes.  For the past four years, Twitter executives have been working with channels like MTV to focus live shows in response to what’s trending.  But what about pre-recorded content?  “Many writers, producers and directors now go so far as to include a ‘Twitter bomb’ in the narrative of their programmes,” says James Kirkham from creative agency Holler.  “They broadcast intentionally polemic or incendiary content which will cause an explosive effect”.

Mark Sorrell, Head of Games at Screenpop, suggests there is more to come in the form of interactive TV, where the show reacts to viewers input individually. This would represent the “televisionification” of games, with audiences transformed into players and their actions reflected back to alter their experience of the show.  However, Sorrell acknowledges “these kind of shows won’t necessarily make for good television”.  He comments that TV is linear and passive.  Games are largely neither.

This has not deterred Will Wright, the software developer behind Sim City and The Sims.  He partnered with Current TV last year to create Bar Karma, the world’s first crowd-sourced programme.  Wright said:  “We’re seeing all forms of entertainment become more participatory, and more social.  So we took what we wanted from games, and from community building, and applied it to television.”

Plot lines, weekly scripts, music choices and character development were all influenced by internet-based democracy.  Once a plot was selected, professional writers turned it into a full script in a process dubbed “directed collaboration.”  Television has always responded to audience tastes and opinion, but can viewers make engaging TV?  Is the art and skill of storytelling being forgotten?

Wright said:  “I think the overall crowd does a pretty good job of filtering the massive amounts of content that flow into a system like this.  We saw it with The Sims.  People posted hundreds of thousands of stories, and the top 5 to 10 percent were really good.  I think the idea that anybody can be creative is true.  And it’s a matter of letting that 5 to 10 percent bubble to the top.”

For many creatives, who wish the ‘dark art’ of programme-making to remain a closed shop, this will be hugely threatening.  But the interest in Bar Karma is undeniable:  over 14 million have visited the website to date, in comparison to Current’s estimated 23,000 nightly viewers.   So it seems the democratisation of television is under way.  But will extended audience participation create truly engaging, sustained and innovative narrative experiences?   The jury is out.  But, as in most cases, creative quality will be the judge.

Broadcast | Comment | 18 November, 2011

Social impact should be at the forefront of broadcasters’ ambitions, writes Sarah Tierney.

Last weekend, my doc The Walking Wounded won the current affairs prize at the 2011 Bafta in Scotland Awards. It attempts to use television as an agent of change and, because of brave commissioning by BBC Scotland, was first shown slap-bang in the 9pm mainstream.

I remain giddy about the potential of TV to be transformational. It can and should entertain. Who doesn’t love a bit of X Factor or TOWIE? But TV doesn’t have to be passive.

It can also inform, engage, inspire, provoke, outrage. But by keeping specialist factual, current affairs and challenging drama consigned to digital outliers such as BBC4 and More4, can it ever be seen as more than marginal?

British factual programming carries an illustrious history and is revered as the best in the business. When we are given the chance to view top-class factual programming in the mainstream, the effects are profound. The UK has a greater love of the natural world thanks to Attenborough’s legacy.

I produce hundreds of short factual films each year for Scottish digital educational producer Twig. We are part of a sea-change in education of digital companies now harnessing this programmemaking heritage, and the power of film, to engage and expand schoolchildren’s horizons worldwide.  And for adults, TV can be the best teacher we never had. However, the truth is, in a ratings-obsessed industry, eyeballs matter.

The BBC says BBC4’s share remains less than 1% of viewers. This makes it hard to argue that this is effective spend of the ever-penny-pinched licence fee. But might these programmes fare better if boldly transmitted in the mainstream?

BBC4 emerged as a potential casualty of the DQF cuts. The cacophony of voices in a subsequent petition surged towards one inimitable truth: “Surely BBC4 is exactly what the BBC is for.” Well, yes. But why is this slate of programming not in the primetime heartland of BBC2 and BBC1?

I do believe that we want to be challenged. The best TV holds a mirror up to the world and asks if we like what we see. Social impact should be at the forefront of broadcasters’ ambitions.

In the words of Lord Reith, first Director-General of the BBC: “He who prides himself on giving what he thinks the audience wants, is often creating a fictitious demand for low standards, which he will then satisfy.”

Sarah Tierney, Head of Content at Twig-it.com.